Original Article
Globalization, Agro-Based Industry and Unemployment: A Three-Sector General Equilibrium Model
Year: 2018 | Month: December | Volume 63 | Issue 4
1.Beladi, Hamid, and Sugata Marjit. 1996. “An Analysis of RuralUrban Migration and Protection.” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(4): 930-940.
View at Google Scholar2.Chaudhuri, Sarbajit, and Dibyendu Banerjee. 2006. “Economic Liberalization and Informal Wage in a Small Open Economy: Does Capital Mobility count?” Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA, No. 1353.
View at Google Scholar3.Corden, W.M. and Findlay, R. 1975. Urban Unemployment, intersectoral capital mobility and development policy, Economica., 42: 59-78.
View at Google Scholar4.Jones, Ronald W. 1965. “The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models.” The Journal of Political Economy, 73(6): 557-572.
View at Google Scholar5.Jones, Ronald W. aJones, Ronald W. and Peter J. Neary. 1984. “Positive Theory of International Trade.” In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 1, by Ronald W Jones and Peter Bain Kenen. North-Holland, Amsterdamnd Peter J. Neary. 1984. “Positive Theory of International Trade.” In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 1, by Ronald W Jones and Peter Bain Kenen. North-Holland, Amsterdam
View at Google Scholar6.Marjit, Sugata. 1981. “Agro-basedindustry and rural-urban migration- A case for an urban employment subsidy.” Journal of Development Economics, pp. 393-398.
View at Google Scholar7.Marjit, Sugata and Dibyendu Maiti. 2005. Globalization, Reform and the Informal Sector. Research Paper No. 2005/12, Finland: UNU-WIDER.
View at Google Scholar8.Marjit, Sugata, Saibal Kar and Punyabrata Sarkar. 2004. “Capital Mobility and Informal Wage in a Small EconomyTwo Examples.” South Asia Economic Journal, 5(2): 261-266
View at Google Scholar9.Saikia, Dilip. 2017. “How Diversified is the Informal Manufacturing Sector Across Indian States?” Journal of Rural and Industrial Development, 5(2).
View at Google Scholar10.Shapiro, Carl and Joseph, E. Stiglitz. 1984. “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device.” American Economic Review, 74: 433-44.
View at Google Scholar